<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Position and Responsibility relationship &#8211; Interview Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/</link>
	<description>Making Siebel Interviews easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Sunitha,
I guess, your wrong for the relationship defination for Responsibility and Employee. Responsibility DRIVE the Visibility of View. whether the view can be seen by a person or not all together, for example Opportunity View is assiged to responsibility called &#039;Sales&#039;, this responsibilty has to be there for CEO, VP, and sales rep, but who see what data is defined and driven by position in the company structure. But this responsibility has to be there for every employee. The relation ship is One employee can have Many Responsibilities and One Responsibility can be assigned to many employees, so it&#039;s M
:M, hope it helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunitha,<br />
I guess, your wrong for the relationship defination for Responsibility and Employee. Responsibility DRIVE the Visibility of View. whether the view can be seen by a person or not all together, for example Opportunity View is assiged to responsibility called &#8216;Sales&#8217;, this responsibilty has to be there for CEO, VP, and sales rep, but who see what data is defined and driven by position in the company structure. But this responsibility has to be there for every employee. The relation ship is One employee can have Many Responsibilities and One Responsibility can be assigned to many employees, so it&#8217;s M<br />
:M, hope it helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunita</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>sunita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>There is no direct relationship between position and resonsibilty.. that is true.
The relation between responsibilty and employees is both 1:M or 1:1 and M:M. It is 1:M when we consider in high level in heirachy of an organization and it is M:M when it is in middle or lower level. example: For CEO of organization the ralationship is 1:1. when we consider VC of sales it is 1:M. i.e, a single person can be VC of two territories, in the absence of the other territory VC.
When it comes to sales reps it can be M:M depending on the tasks they get.

Coming to Position and Employees it can be 1:1 or 1:M. in top level it is 1:1. In middle or down levels it is 1:M

Thanks
Sunita</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no direct relationship between position and resonsibilty.. that is true.<br />
The relation between responsibilty and employees is both 1:M or 1:1 and M:M. It is 1:M when we consider in high level in heirachy of an organization and it is M:M when it is in middle or lower level. example: For CEO of organization the ralationship is 1:1. when we consider VC of sales it is 1:M. i.e, a single person can be VC of two territories, in the absence of the other territory VC.<br />
When it comes to sales reps it can be M:M depending on the tasks they get.</p>
<p>Coming to Position and Employees it can be 1:1 or 1:M. in top level it is 1:1. In middle or down levels it is 1:M</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Sunita</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soj</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Soj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>though the relationship betwen position and employee and responsibility and empolyee is M:M. It indicates that we have an indirect relationship between the two via employee.Which we can very well see over the User-Administration &gt;&gt; Employees screen.

Guess it was the vaguest relationship that i could make!![:D]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>though the relationship betwen position and employee and responsibility and empolyee is M:M. It indicates that we have an indirect relationship between the two via employee.Which we can very well see over the User-Administration &gt;&gt; Employees screen.</p>
<p>Guess it was the vaguest relationship that i could make!![:D]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijay r s</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>vijay r s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Suresh, I think the relation between positions and employees is M:M (an employee can have more one positions) and same is applied in case of responsibilities n employess.

And there is no relationship between position n responsibility

hope im right :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suresh, I think the relation between positions and employees is M:M (an employee can have more one positions) and same is applied in case of responsibilities n employess.</p>
<p>And there is no relationship between position n responsibility</p>
<p>hope im right <img src='http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suresh</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I can put it the answer in other way. there is no direct relation ship between responsibilities and and positions. And positions are related to the employees(1:M) and responsibilities also related to the Employess(1:M).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can put it the answer in other way. there is no direct relation ship between responsibilities and and positions. And positions are related to the employees(1:M) and responsibilities also related to the Employess(1:M).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: java</title>
		<link>http://interview.siebelunleashed.com/blog/configuration/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>java</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelunleashed.com/position-and-responsibility-relationship-interview-question/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>What kind of relationship exists between Position and Responsibilities?

Exact answer to this question is : No Relation ship between view and responsibilty as both are not realted to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of relationship exists between Position and Responsibilities?</p>
<p>Exact answer to this question is : No Relation ship between view and responsibilty as both are not realted to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

